🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the Britain, and it seems it’s time for a rethink. Throughout its history, an event that started out as a commemorative event of the past, cultural identity and bonds between Black populations worldwide, has developed a corporate feel, growing to encompass functions where African descendants are paid to talk to Caucasian groups about hidden biases and supportive partnership. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s generated a rise in the industry of demonstrating racial awareness. Yet, that phase is now over. The wave has crested, producing a diluted aftermath of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Origins of Black History Observance

Originally observed in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was created in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with seven days of celebration and reflection in the February's second week. Black History Month grew out of this movement and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the US and Canada in the second month, but also in October in the United Kingdom, Deutschland, Éire and the Netherlands.

The period has evolved since that time, focusing less on the histories of colonial slavery and struggles for equality, and more on prominent Black figures in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and broadly celebrating the contribution Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the manner the observance is commemorated is a indication of the political moment. How it evolves is a good lesson in how assimilation leads to dismantling: the transformation of Black History Month has stymied the point of it, which is to tackle embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Jarring Moment

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to reevaluate Black History Month more than the current time in which it falls this year. In the United Kingdom, a reemerging right-wing in the guise of the Reform party is top in opinion ratings. In the warmer months we witnessed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in the history of Britain. the Conservative leader, the African descendant in charge of the right-wing political group, is a firm opponent of anti-racism activism, and we are in a situation where a member of parliament feels emboldened to declare that “not seeing any white faces” in parts of a city is a reason for concern. Simultaneously, ultra-nationalist movements are growing in the European continent as a complete entity.

In the America, a significant offensive against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been taken, frequently with success, to the highest courts of the nation. A drive to scrub the history of people of color and experience from the archives is under way. One of the former president's first executive orders aimed at the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the prestigious establishment, accusing them of a organized and extensive campaign to rewrite our Nation’s history” by representing the nation “as naturally discriminatory”.

In this context, the celebration symbolises how little it can be influential if it is limited to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or depoliticized celebrations of contributions in the past, rather than confronting the realities of the contemporary world. It also reveals how its limited duration means that it is detached from the wider consistent effort that is required. A university professor, a professor at University of Greenwich, expressed it perfectly when she raised concerns about the temporary “tokenism” of the observance. “The problem with embracing a superficial method”, she wrote, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month becomes a fleeting performance rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Figuring out how to adapt, revise and extend initiatives for racial equality and recognition in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a treacherous thing. There is a temptation to just discontinue things like Black History Month completely, assuming they are no longer suitable, or are vestiges of an time that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and tradition of activism for racial justice – local anti-racism groups, inclusion and equity efforts, and certainly, even commercial engagements – represent an framework that a significant effort has gone into. It is there not only to deteriorate as the politics moves on (and in fact, regresses), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month appear as? Well, first, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is distributed across all seasons (as some institutions are already beginning to do), parts of its content (particularly around prominent figures of color) incorporated into school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not avoid politics, and provides room for citizens, particularly youth, to share their anxieties and narratives. What purpose serves simple recognition of the bygone era when it doesn’t reckon with the contemporary truth of extreme conservative demonstrations in the street? Institutions who celebrate it should not be comforted with the non-confrontational words of implicit prejudice and sensitivity to minor insults, but challenged by the dangers that face all if opposition to discrimination is not taken seriously. In short, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, critical, and responsive. Maybe an complete renaming is necessary – Black History is Now Month.